Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan Penentuan Prioritas Pekerjaan Smart City Menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Studi Kasus Kabupaten Kotabaru

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Nov 30, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34128/jsi.v11i2.1870
Keywords:
Smart City, Prioritas Pekerjaan, AHP, Consistency Ratio, Kabupaten Kotabaru

Main Article Content

Andi Farmadi
a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:29:"Universitas Lambung Mangkurat";}
Ichsan Ridwan
Prodi Fisika FMIPA, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat Jl Jend. Ahmad Yani Km 36 Banjarbaru, Kalimantan Selatan
Baharuddin Sabur
Prodi Kelautan, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat. Jl Jend. Ahmad Yani Km 36 Banjarbaru, Kalimantan Selatan
Rachmat Hidayat
Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Riset dan Inovasi Daerah Kabupaten Kotabaru, Kalsel
Rurien Srihardjanti
Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Riset dan Inovasi Daerah Kabupaten Kotabaru, Kalsel

Abstract

Transformasi digital melalui pengembangan Smart City menjadi salah satu strategi utama dalam meningkatkan efisiensi tata kelola, kualitas pelayanan publik, dan daya saing daerah. Kabupaten Kotabaru telah menyusun Masterplan Smart City dengan berbagai program strategis. Namun, keterbatasan sumber daya menuntut adanya penentuan prioritas pekerjaan yang sistematis. Penelitian ini bertujuan menentukan urutan prioritas pekerjaan berdasarkan metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Tiga kriteria utama yang digunakan adalah urgensi, dampak strategis, dan ketergantungan antar kegiatan. Diperoleh Nilai Prioritas AHP yaitu tinggi (AHP > 0.11), sedang (0.09 ≤ AHP ≤ 0.11) dan rendah (AHP < 0.09). Nilai hasil uji consistency ratio (CR) < 0,1 menunjukkan hasil yang dapat diterima dan reliabel. Berdasarkan hasil AHP, pembentukan kelembagaan Smart City menempati prioritas tertinggi, diikuti finalisasi SOP dan e-Gov. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat dijadikan acuan kuantitatif dalam pengambilan keputusan bagi pemerintah daerah untuk mengoptimalkan alokasi sumber daya dan memastikan inisiatif Smart City dapat dijalankan secara efektif.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
A. Farmadi, I. Ridwan, B. Sabur, R. Hidayat, and R. Srihardjanti, “Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan Penentuan Prioritas Pekerjaan Smart City Menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Studi Kasus Kabupaten Kotabaru”, JSI, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 120–129, Nov. 2025.
Issue
Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Sains dan Informatika
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

[1] Z. R. M. A. Kaiser, “Smart governance for smart cities and nations,” Journal of Economy and Technology, vol. 2, pp. 216–234, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ject.2024.07.003.

[2] H. Xia, B. Muskat, M. Karl, G. Li, and R. Law, “Destination competitiveness research over the past three decades: a computational literature review using topic modelling,” Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 726–742, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1080/10548408.2024.2332278.

[3] K. Gazzeh, “Ranking Sustainable Smart City Indicators Using Combined Content Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process Techniques,” Smart Cities, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 2883–2909, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.3390/smartcities6050129.

[4] S. Singh and V. Kumar, “Modelling the determinants for sustainable smart city through interpretive structure modelling and analytic hierarchy process,” Computational Urban Science, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 16, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s43762-024-00125-1.

[5] D. Li, W. Wang, G. Huang, S. Zhou, S. Zhu, and H. Feng, “How to Enhance Citizens’ Sense of Gain in Smart Cities? A SWOT-AHP-TOWS Approach,” Soc Indic Res, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 787–820, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11205-022-03047-9.

[6] Y. Ro, I. Roh, J. Jahng, and B. Kwon, “Determining Priority in Smart City Technologies and Services for International Development Cooperation,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1332–1344, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1080/08874417.2022.2150913.

[7] Presiden Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Presiden Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 Tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik. Indonesia, 2018.

[8] F. Subkhan et al., Buku Panduan Penyusunan Masterplan Smart City 2021: Gerakan Menuju Smart City . Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Aplikasi Informatika Kemenkominfo Republik Indonesia, 2021.

[9] T. Kuo and M.-H. Chen, “On using pairwise comparison in the analytic hierarchy process: Validity is goal while consistency is means,” Inf Sci (N Y), vol. 648, p. 119630, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2023.119630.

[10] A. Petrillo, V. Salomon, and C. Tramarico, “State-of-the-Art Review on the Analytic Hierarchy Process with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 16, no. 8, p. 372, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/jrfm16080372.

[11] V. A. P. Salomon and L. F. A. M. Gomes, “Consistency Improvement in the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 828, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3390/math12060828.

[12] S. Frish, I. Talmor, O. Hadar, M. Shoshany, and A. Shapira, “Enhancing consistency of AHP-based expert judgements: A new approach and its implementation in an interactive tool,” MethodsX, vol. 14, p. 103341, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2025.103341.