Pengujian Usability Website Pondok Pesantren Qodratullah Menggunakan System Usability Scale

Main Article Content

Fitri Purwaningtias Usman Ependi

Abstract

Website saat ini telah digunakan diberbagai jenis instansi termasuk instansi pendidikan seperti Pondok Pesantren Qodratullah. Saat ini website Pondok Pesantren Qodratullah menjadi tulang punggung dalam penyebaran informasi terkain pondok pesantren kepada wali santri, alumni, calon santri dan masyarakat luas. Mengingat pentingnya website bagi Pondok Pesantren Qodratullah maka perlu untuk dilakukan evaluasi apakah informasi yang diberikan dan website yang ada telah memiliki nilai kebergunaan bagi pengguna atau tidak. Untuk itu di dalam penelitian ini dilakukan evaluasi untuk melihat perspektif pengguna terhadap website. Prose evaluasi dilakukan dengan system usability scale dengan sepuluh instrumen sebagai pernyataan evaluasi. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan bahwa website Pondok Pesantren Qodratullah mendapatkan nilai akhir 88. Nilai 88 berarti website Pondok Pesantren Qodratullah mendapatkan adjective rating yang excellence, grade scale tergolong kelompok B dan tingkat acceptability termasuk acceptable.


The website is currently used in various types of institutions including educational institutions such as Qodratullah Islamic Boarding School. Currently the Qodratullah Islamic Boarding School website is the backbone in the dissemination of information about Islamic boarding schools to the guardians of students, alumni, prospective students and the wider community. Considering the importance of the website for the Qodratullah Islamic Boarding School, it is necessary to evaluate whether the information provided, and the existing website have a useful value for the user or not. For this reason, in this study an evaluation was conducted to see the user's perspective on the website. The evaluation process is carried out with a system usability scale with ten instruments as evaluation statements. Evaluation results show that the Qodratullah Islamic Boarding School website gets a final score of 88. A value of 88 means that the Qodratullah Islamic Boarding School website gets an adjective rating that excellence, grade scale belongs to group B and the level of acceptability is acceptable

Article Details

How to Cite
PURWANINGTIAS, Fitri; EPENDI, Usman. Pengujian Usability Website Pondok Pesantren Qodratullah Menggunakan System Usability Scale. Jurnal Sains dan Informatika, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 34-43, june 2020. ISSN 2598-5841. Available at: <https://jsi.politala.ac.id/index.php/JSI/article/view/220>. Date accessed: 24 sep. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.34128/jsi.v6i1.220.
Section
Articles

References

[1] N. Huda, “Analisis Kinerja Website PT. PLN (Persero) menggunakan Metode Pieces,” Sist. J. Sist. Inf., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 78–89, 2019.
[2] F. C. Andika, I. D. Kurniawati, and S. Nita, “Perancangan Media Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Website pada Prodi Teknik Informatika UNIPMA,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (SENATIK), 2019, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 135–140.
[3] N. R. Riyadi, “Pengujian Usability Untuk Meningkatkan Antarmuka Aplikasi Mobile myUMM Students,” Sist. J. Sist. Inf., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 226–232, 2019.
[4] T. Xie, H. Chen, J. Li, and H. Xiong, “A study on the methods of software testing based on the design models,” in 2011 6th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 2011, pp. 111–113.
[5] U. Ependi, “Heuristic Evaluation for Mobile Application (Studi Kasus: Aplikasi Depo Auto 2000 Tanjung Api Api Palembang),” Simetris J. Tek. Mesin, Elektro dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 563–570, 2017.
[6] U. Ependi, F. Panjaitan, and H. Hutrianto, “System Usability Scale Antarmuka Palembang Guide Sebagai Media Pendukung Asian Games XVIII,” J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Bus. Intell., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 80–86, 2017.
[7] W. U. Martoyo and F. Suprapto, “Kajian Evaluasi Usability dan Utility pada Situs Web,” SESINDO 2015, vol. 2015, 2015.
[8] J. R. Lewis and J. Sauro, “The factor structure of the system usability scale,” in International conference on human centered design, 2009, pp. 94–103.
[9] P. T. Kortum and A. Bangor, “Usability ratings for everyday products measured with the System Usability Scale,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 67–76, 2013.
[10] B. Pudjoatmodjo and R. Wijaya, “Tes Kegunaan (Usabilty Testing) Pada Aplikasi Kepegawaian Dengan Menggunakan System Usabilty Scale (Studi Kasus: Dinas Pertanian Kabupaten Bandung),” SEMNASTEKNOMEDIA ONLINE, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 2–9, 2016.
[11] F. P. Juniawan and D. Y. Sylfania, “Usability Evaluation of Android-Based Lecturer Research Publication Reporting System,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 123–134, 2020.
[12] J. Sauro, A practical guide to the system usability scale: Background, benchmarks & best practices. Measuring Usability LLC, 2011.
[13] A. Bangor, P. Kortum, and J. Miller, “Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale,” J. usability Stud., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 114–123, 2009.
[14] T. S. Tullis and J. N. Stetson, “A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability,” in Usability professional association conference, 2004, vol. 1.
[15] J. Sauro, “Measuring usability with the system usability scale (SUS).” 2011.
[16] S. Suyanto and U. Ependi, “Pengujian Usability dengan Teknik System Usability Scale pada Test Engine Try Out Sertifikasi,” MATRIK J. Manajemen, Tek. Inform. dan Rekayasa Komput., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 62–69, 2019.
[17] U. Ependi, A. Putra, and F. Panjaitan, “Evaluasi tingkat kebergunaan aplikasi Administrasi Penduduk menggunakan teknik System Usability Scale,” Regist. J. Ilm. Teknol. Sist. Inf., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 63–76, 2019.